Recorded Case 01Front-glass cracks
Critical crack network
A critical central crack finding with inventory agreement makes this the clearest overview of how recorded evidence is presented.
Screen damage confirmed
Recorded inventory · Agreed
THE RECORDED LIBRARY
Real photographs.
Open to inspection.
Explore 36 recorded VisionX inspections. Every annotated card opens a dedicated page with the original, web-readable overlay, outcome, limitations, and related cases.
Showing all 36 recorded inspections.
01 / FRONT-GLASS CRACKS
Front-glass cracks
Recorded crack findings ranging from localized edge damage to broad crack networks.
Recorded Case 01
Recorded Case 02Front-glass cracks
Lower-corner crack
This record shows a localized high-severity crack rather than a full-screen damage field.
Screen damage confirmed
Recorded inventory · Agreed
Recorded Case 03Front-glass cracks
Two-region crack pattern
The canonical inventory retains both the upper-left and central findings instead of collapsing them into one label.
Screen damage confirmed
Recorded inventory · Agreed
Recorded Case 04Front-glass cracks
Dense central crack field
The recorded outcome is damaged, with one critical canonical crack region and a disclosed inventory dispute.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 05Front-glass cracks
Full-height crack evidence
A broad canonical region communicates the recorded extent without pretending to trace each crack line.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 06Front-glass cracks
Compact top-edge crack
This case demonstrates why small canonical boxes need legible website strokes at card size.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 07Front-glass cracks
Crack on dark glass
The evidence remains inspectable even though capture artifacts occupy much of the front glass.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 08Front-glass cracks
Lower-glass crack
The canonical result separates the lower crack from the screen-content and glare artifacts in the same frame.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 09Front-glass cracks
Small right-edge crack
A small recorded boundary remains visible in the web presentation without enlarging its canonical geometry.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 10Front-glass cracks
Lower-screen crack
The record provides an agreed crack inventory while retaining the original display context.
Screen damage confirmed
Recorded inventory · Agreed
02 / CRACK AND CHIP
Crack and chip
Views where more than one form of front-glass damage appears in the recorded inventory.
Recorded Case 11Crack and chip
Crack and chip
The recorded result preserves the crack and chip as separate canonical findings.
Screen damage confirmed
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
Recorded Case 12Crack and chip
Top crack with corner chip
The different severity labels help reviewers distinguish a dominant crack from a more localized chip.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 13Crack and chip
Color-screen crack and chip
This record keeps the glass findings distinct from screen content and moiré artifacts.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 14Crack and chip
Upper-left crack and chip
The overlay makes the two recorded boundaries inspectable without merging their labels.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 15Crack and chip
Left crack with lower chip
The recorded inventory differentiates a high-severity crack from a medium-severity chip.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 16Crack and chip
Central crack with corner chip
The canonical order retains the chip and crack as independent findings in the same damaged result.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 17Crack and chip
Critical crack with side chip
This case demonstrates a resolved damaged outcome with multiple severity levels and an inventory caveat.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 18Crack and chip
Central crack with top chip
The full-frame view keeps the small top chip visible without cropping away device context.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
03 / DISPLAY ANOMALIES
Display anomalies
Display lines, dark regions, or shade/bleed discoloration recorded alongside glass damage.
Recorded Case 19Display anomalies
Display line and crack
The canonical record separates display damage from glass damage while resolving one damaged outcome.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 20Display anomalies
Black spot and chip
The thicker website overlay helps both compact findings remain visible without changing their boxes.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 21Display anomalies
Shade, bleed and crack
This is the B-variant hero: a resolved damaged result with clearly disclosed inventory disagreement.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 22Display anomalies
Lower shade/bleed with crack
This companion case shows the same display-damage type in a different location and photograph.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
Recorded Case 23Display anomalies
Black spot with crack
The case keeps a small display anomaly inspectable alongside more extensive glass damage.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
04 / SCRATCHES
Scratches
Light and heavy scratch-led records, including one mixed scratch and crack result.
Recorded Case 24Scratches
Heavy scratch
The result retains the scratch taxonomy instead of rewriting every linear mark as a crack.
Screen damage confirmed
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
Recorded Case 25Scratches
Two heavy scratches
The canonical result preserves two locations rather than representing all surface damage with one box.
Screen damage confirmed
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
Recorded Case 26Scratches
Central heavy scratch
The web overlay distinguishes the damage boundary from overlapping reflection and darkness artifacts.
Screen damage confirmed
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
Recorded Case 27Scratches
Light scratch
This case shows why damage findings and capture or surface artifacts remain separate lists.
Screen damage confirmed
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
Recorded Case 28Scratches
Crack with heavy scratch
The mixed inventory demonstrates that scratch-led cases can still contain higher-impact glass damage.
Screen damage confirmed
Exact finding inventory disputed
05 / NO CONFIRMED DAMAGE
No confirmed damage
Usable photographed views where the recorded result confirmed no visible defect.
Recorded Case 29No confirmed damage
Clear photographed view
The record demonstrates the scoped wording “no confirmed visible damage” for the supplied photograph.
No confirmed visible damage
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
Recorded Case 30No confirmed damage
Clear color home screen
Screen content is retained as a low-impact artifact rather than being mistaken for damage.
No confirmed visible damage
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
Recorded Case 31No confirmed damage
Clear weather home screen
The full-frame view keeps screen content and upper-screen glare visible as separate capture artifacts.
No confirmed visible damage
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
Recorded Case 32No confirmed damage
Clear weather-screen view
No canonical defect was confirmed, while the capture artifacts remain visible for review.
No confirmed visible damage
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
Recorded Case 33No confirmed damage
Clear device home screen
The no-damage conclusion remains paired with its capture-quality context rather than presenting a synthetic clean view.
No confirmed visible damage
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
Recorded Case 34No confirmed damage
Clear dark weather screen
The case broadens the clean set beyond bright studio displays while retaining artifact disclosure.
No confirmed visible damage
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
Recorded Case 35No confirmed damage
Clear desk-side view
This non-studio example shows the same evidence contract in a more everyday capture setting.
No confirmed visible damage
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
Recorded Case 36No confirmed damage
Clear vivid display
The clean result remains paired with its original full frame and recorded screen-content artifact.
No confirmed visible damage
Recorded inventory · Consensus not applicable
HOW TO READ THIS LIBRARY
A record of an inspection.
Not the whole device.
Recorded VisionX inspection. The source photograph was auto-oriented, metadata-stripped, and resized for web only. Recorded canonical findings were re-rendered with thicker web-only boundaries for readability; their geometry was not expanded or repaired. Results apply only to the photographed view and are not accuracy benchmarks, functional tests, or whole-device guarantees.
No customer identity or workflow provenance is inferred from these images. The scenarios on the Solutions page are illustrative.
Understand the review processTHE NEXT STEP
Evaluate with your own evidence.
Use representative photographs from your real workflow to understand how capture conditions and decision rules affect results.